Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kyle Edmund vs Miomir Kecmanovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Edmund vs Kecmanovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Edmund vs Miomir Kecmanovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Edmund 1 - 1 Kecmanovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Edmund has won 52.27% of points on their second serve, while Kecmanovic has won 52.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Edmund, in recent form, has won 52.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kecmanovic has won 51.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.72% and 28.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Edmund has saved 61.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kecmanovic has saved 55.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Edmund has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 24/ 15), with Kecmanovic winning 46.55% (W/L 27/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 55/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 13/ 25). Kecmanovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 120/ 75), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Edmund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.27% of matches (W/L 17/ 5), where as Kecmanovic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 46.88% of matches (W/L 15/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Edmund winning 1 times and Kecmanovic being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Edmund winning 2 and Kecmanovic winning 2. The last match between Edmund and Kecmanovic was at the Adelaide International 2 - Adelaide, 09-01-2023, First, Hard with Miomir Kecmanovic getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Edmund and Kecmanovic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Edmund winning 0 times and Kecmanovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Edmund winning 0, and Kecmanovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Edmund has played against opponents with an average rank of 311.26 while Kecmanovic has played against players with an average rank of 134.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Edmund has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kecmanovic has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Edmund has converted 39.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kecmanovic has converted 39.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
496
Rank
14
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
57
Rank
27
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
61% (334-214)
Career Total W/L
58% (281-206)
61% (17-11)
YTD W/L
48% (14-15)
$3,623,010
Career Prize Money
$3,925,650
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Edmund VS Kecmanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Miomir Kecmanovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 21 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 19 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:59 | 1:17:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (77/127) | 63% (69/109) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (60/77) | 74% (51/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (25/50) | 57% (23/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (35/109) | 33% (42/127) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Edmund VS Kecmanovic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Kyle Edmund
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Miomir Kecmanovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (17/11) | 48% (14/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (40/28) | 45% (34/42) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (348/307) | 48% (351/379) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 50% (7/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 127 | 131 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:22 | 1:56:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 348 | 132.03 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1177/2015) | 64% (1418/2223) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (852/1177) | 69% (976/1418) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (438/838) | 53% (424/805) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (80/201) | 39% (81/206) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (787/2034) | 37% (864/2319) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 91% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (17/28) | 39% (9/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/5) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 21% (3/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 74% (19/14) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 26% (19/5) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 17% (18/3) |
Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Kyle Edmund
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Keenan Mayo
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Kyle Edmund
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Gerald Melzer
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Kyle Edmund
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Miomir Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Daniil Medvedev
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
1-6 0-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
54 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
47 of
78)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
24%
(
24 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
124
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Casper Ruud
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
81
Total Points Won
87
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
David Goffin
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Edmund Vs Kecmanovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
